Beeses T9K Mafia 1: Game

Downed_Foes said:
From that, and my previous post, It looks an awful lot like your in the mafia, trying to protect a fellow mafia member of yours...

VOTE CHANGE: Vincent2128
Click to expand...
But there already are votes on claw, if you believe he is scum and I am too, then why don't you lynch him first instead? If you sincerely believe I am scum, then just tell everybody to ignore my posts for the rest of the 'day' and lynch me tomorrow.
Also, you are under no obligation to believe anything that anybody says in this thread. Argue about it all you want.
 
Downed_Foes said:
From that, and my previous post, It looks an awful lot like your in the mafia, trying to protect a fellow mafia member of yours...

VOTE CHANGE: Vincent2128
Click to expand...

If I am indeed a lying mason. The real mason(s) will testify against me (which they haven't of course).

And Vincent isn't a mason member, (heck even i don't know who he is). But I'll do nothing about voting him. My vote is reserved for our #1 suspect ( Dutch )

Also, my credibility grows if I get killed. Mason #2 will continue my work. You and vincent and the whole town should really cry out for the real masons to testify against me now or there can never be established trust. If I was indeed an imposter mason, wouldn't there be anyone voting to lynch me on day 2? but alas, its day 3, and no one spoke out against me.

My identity as a mason remains unchallenged.
 
MagicForDummies said:
They know full well that I am a mason and my actions were only to benefit towny.
Click to expand...

Apart from trying not to kill an innocent, which he may well have turned out to be, I have done nothing in stalling voting. We have only had one real vote anyway. And I am calling your BS now, I have no proof that you are a Mason, yet you seem to think this allows you to rule us all.

VOTE: MAGICFORDUMMIES
 
moondoggy23 said:
I'm confused...
Click to expand...
Does moondoggy require a TL;DR?!


clawstrider said:
have no proof that you are a Mason, yet you seem to think this allows you to rule us all.
Click to expand...
I have no proof that he isn't a Mason. No counterclaims (audacious move claiming a role Day 1, yet no counter claims whatsoever).

MagicForDummies said:
Also, my credibility grows if I get killed. Mason #2 will continue my work. You and vincent and the whole town should really cry out for the real masons to testify against me now or there can never be established trust. If I was indeed an imposter mason, wouldn't there be anyone voting to lynch me on day 2? but alas, its day 3, and no one spoke out against me.

My identity as a mason remains unchallenged.
Click to expand...
Important part highlighted.
I will be watching for who Mason #2 is and note them down, but I will not put it out in the open for the mafia to read.
However, what if you get killed and mafia fakes as Mason #2?

----
Here's what I think happened the previous night assuming Vorsprung is a Doctor.
Vorsprung - Protect Magic (masonclaim with no counterclaim)
??? - Protect Vorsprung (attacked night before and likely to be attacked again)[/quote]
 
clawstrider said:
Apart from trying not to kill an innocent, which he may well have turned out to be, I have done nothing in stalling voting. We have only had one real vote anyway. And I am calling your BS now, I have no proof that you are a Mason, yet you seem to think this allows you to rule us all.

VOTE: MAGICFORDUMMIES
Click to expand...
Heh, do you have anything to defend yourself then? You have such a baseless argument and I'd like to hear some backup. Otherwise, my vote still stands.
 
katphish said:
Heh, do you have anything to defend yourself then? You have such a baseless argument and I'd like to hear some backup. Otherwise, my vote still stands.
Click to expand...

Sure, I voted no lynch on a hunch, a hunch that could have turned out to be correct, considering the guy in question is now lying dead by the Mafia. I would like to see where I have ever voted without an arguement, and if there is one, I would be more than happy to explain.
 
clawstrider said:
Sure, I voted no lynch on a hunch, a hunch that could have turned out to be correct, considering the guy in question is now lying dead by the Mafia. I would like to see where I have ever voted without an arguement, and if there is one, I would be more than happy to explain.
Click to expand...
Mafia killed Mafia possibility?
You cannot be sure that your hunch is correct.
Also I get the feeling you completely missed my v.important anti-no lynch post. Even if you disagreed with my train of thought on SKProjecto, you could have started up a case on someone else.
 
On another note, I would very much like the following list of VIPs to contribute more.

_Joostb
bbgunshot
Bu_3sko0or96
ienjoywaffles
im3nuron
karmahurts
Squeebz
ThaProfessor
TheNinjaDavid
Vorsprung
ZEROBIT4

Lurking around= Scummy until proven otherwise.
 
MagicForDummies said:
I'm taking charge. You don't need to trust him. But you need to trust me. I am a mason. Now we need to shift focus on Dutch.
Click to expand...
I just re-read this post, and it seems more dodgey than ever. Magic is trying to get us to lynch people, for the sole reason that he is a mason, so that is what is right. I honestly don't believe that magic is a mason, but the real masons are probably too scared of being killed to counterclaim, or not being believed, and people thinking they are Mafia.
 
clawstrider said:
I just re-read this post, and it seems more dodgey than ever. Magic is trying to get us to lynch people, for the sole reason that he is a mason, so that is what is right. I honestly don't believe that magic is a mason, but the real masons are probably too scared of being killed to counterclaim, or not being believed, and people thinking they are Mafia.
Click to expand...
Counter-claiming - called for clearly and deliberately by Magic, no reply.
Mafia wouldn't call for a counterclaim.
 
Vincent2128 said:
Does moondoggy require a TL;DR?!



I have no proof that he isn't a Mason. No counterclaims (audacious move claiming a role Day 1, yet no counter claims whatsoever).


Important part highlighted.
I will be watching for who Mason #2 is and note them down, but I will not put it out in the open for the mafia to read.
However, what if you get killed and mafia fakes as Mason #2?

----
Here's what I think happened the previous night assuming Vorsprung is a Doctor.
Vorsprung - Protect Magic (masonclaim with no counterclaim)
??? - Protect Vorsprung (attacked night before and likely to be attacked again)
Click to expand...
[/quote]

If I die it'd be really hard for the fake mason to claim himself as mason #2.

First of all.
- He needs to have at least a team member to back him up. (if he was mafia then he'd be putting his team at risk)
- Needs to execute ( I'm a Mason, who dare challenges my right ) to prove himself
- The true mason would then challenge him and this already puts the liar at risk
- I will tell my masons to be the first to execute the challenge immediately after my death in the morning

Remember, the challenge should only be answered by "masons". This is the sure fire way to know who's who.
 
MagicForDummies said:
- I will tell my masons to be the first to execute the challenge immediately after my death in the morning
Click to expand...
You better.
(I'm sticking with the assumption of you as a Mason, it seems really credible to me, and there really is nothing to go off of with all the lurkers I put above ^^.)
 
clawstrider said:
Apart from trying not to kill an innocent, which he may well have turned out to be, I have done nothing in stalling voting. We have only had one real vote anyway. And I am calling your BS now, I have no proof that you are a Mason, yet you seem to think this allows you to rule us all.

VOTE: MAGICFORDUMMIES
Click to expand...

You can argue against me. But the masons are putting suspicion on Dutchcheese's behavior. You've seen the way he and taco were sort of banding on not voting projecto.

What do you say on Dutchcheese's behavior? Was it a least bit strange that he spoke little and did little to nothing? what about the way he's posting on the thread? The only reason I'm suspecting you is because you seem to be affliated with them. You can prove me wrong by working on Dutch, this will help the towny.

If it seems you have no affliation whatsoever with Dutch I will have no reason to argue against you.
 
MagicForDummies said:
You can argue against me. But the masons are putting suspicion on Dutchcheese's behavior. You've seen the way he and taco were sort of banding on not voting projecto.

What do you say on Dutchcheese's behavior? Was it a least bit strange that he spoke little and did little to nothing? what about the way he's posting on the thread? The only reason I'm suspecting you is because you seem to be affliated with them. You can prove me wrong by working on Dutch, this will help the towny.

If it seems you have no affliation whatsoever with Dutch I will have no reason to argue against you.
Click to expand...
You say you have Dutch as #1 suspicion but no vote. Analysis w/out reaction is not much better than inaction.

----
I am fairly certain that claw has mafia experience from elsewhere, that would pretty much explain everything he has posted so far.
 
MagicForDummies said:
You can argue against me. But the masons are putting suspicion on Dutchcheese's behavior. You've seen the way he and taco were sort of banding on not voting projecto.

What do you say on Dutchcheese's behavior? Was it a least bit strange that he spoke little and did little to nothing? what about the way he's posting on the thread? The only reason I'm suspecting you is because you seem to be affliated with them. You can prove me wrong by working on Dutch, this will help the towny.

If it seems you have no affliation whatsoever with Dutch I will have no reason to argue against you.
Click to expand...

I am guessing you are the mason spokesperson, and you havn't named the other masons correct?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top