Ok everybody. Read this.
If we continue to perpetually vote for no lynch, the following scenarios could happen
a) Nobody says anything incriminating, mafia pick us all off, we lose.
b) Nobody says anything incriminating, mafia get picked off by cereal killer, we get picked off by cereal killer, we lose.
c) Somebody says something incriminating, everybody lynches that person (who is in fact innocent), then everybody starts analyzing the reasons why the person was lynched and the game proceeds with a more tense atmosphere.
d) (The least likely) After some time somebody starts deducing who the mafia are, and somehow we lynch them all.
Usually, in other places, one votes randomly for random people on the first day, and hopes for luck in getting scum. (That's my reason for voting Zero earlier.) If anyone says something incriminating, we can lynch that person. In the course of this, if anyone else makes an vote that's not fully justified, then we could lynch this person and so on...
Thus we cannot vote for no lynch or we lose.
Subnote:
VOTE: Projecto
His posts yesterday (in the mafia game that is) are just weird. I want answers to why you put them like that, Projecto.
Join the bandwagon, lynch Projecto and be rid of this scum!
what troubles me is that Vorsprung was attacked for no reason but was saved by the doctor, may Vorsprung be the doctor and was trying to prevent his own life from being taken,
Doctors cannot protect themselves. Though it might have been possible that
1. The other doctor protected him (remember, they have a private chat as well)
2. The mafia who attempted the kill was roleblocked (this would be by pure luck though)